Submit Comment

show all (3)
There are no comments. Click the text to your left to make a new comment.

Hört sich vielversprechend an. Woher hast du diese Infos?

reply

Do you have the links to the site from where you downloaded this article? Or, can you give me the full citation?

reply

Hello Zainab. I saw a pre-print copy – and as far as I can tell the final is not yet published. (Apologies, if should have been referenced as ‘Forthcoming’ of course). I’ll check with Emer Coleman if a copy is yet available…

reply
1 0

2009. Creating impact for an eUnion 2015 – The Visby Declaration, Visby. Available at: http://www.se2009.eu/polopoly_fs/1.22793!menu/standard/file/conclusions%20visby.pdf.

2 0

Aichholzer, G. Burkert, H., 2004. Public sector information in the digital age: between markets, public management and citizens rights, Edward Elgar Publishing.

3 0

Alani, H. et al., 2007. Unlocking the potential of public sector information with semantic web technology. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 4825, 708.

4 0

Allan, R., 2009. The Power of Government Information. In J. Gøtze C. B. Pedersen, eds. State of the eUnion: Government 2.0 and Onwards. AuthorHouse.

5 0

Bartholomew, D.J. et al., 2008. Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data, Second Edition (Chapman Hall/Crc Statistics in the Social and Behavioral Scie) 2nd ed., Chapman and Hall/CRC.

6 0

Becker, R.A., Chambers, J.M. Wilks, A.R., 1988. The new S language: a programming environment for data analysis and graphics.

7 0

Beetham, D., 1994. Defining and measuring democracy, Sage Publications Ltd.

8 0

Beniger, J.R., 1986. The control revolution: Technological and economic origins of the information society, Harvard Univ Pr.

9 0

Benkler, Y., 2007. The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom, Yale Univ Pr.

10 0

Bennett, C., 1985. From the Dark to the Light: The Open Government Debate in Britain. Journal of Public Policy, 5(02), 187-213.

11 0

Berners-Lee, T., 2009. Putting Government Data online Design Issues. Available at: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/GovData.html [Accessed May 19, 2010].

12 0

Bilgin, A. et al., 2009. Graphviz-Graph Visualization Software, Graphviz.

13 0

Bimber, B.A., 2003. Information and American democracy: Technology in the evolution of political power, Cambridge Univ Pr.

14 0

Bizer, C., Heath, T. Berners-Lee, T., 2009. Linked data–the story so far. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 5(3), 1–22.

15 0

Boland, L. Coleman, E., 2008. New Development: What Lies Beyond Service Delivery? Leadership Behaviours for Place Shaping in Local Government. Public Money Management, 28(5), 313–318.

16 0

Boland, L. Colman, E., Can Leviathan stop gobbling people up and start really listening to them?

17 0

Borg, S., 2001. The research journal: a tool for promoting and understanding researcher development. Language Teaching Research, 156 -177.

18 0

Bowker, G.C., 2000. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Studies of Science, 643–683.

19 0

Brewer, J. Hunter, A., 2006. Foundations of multimethod research, SAGE.

20 0

Brown, G., 2009. Speech on Building Britain’s Digital Future. Available at: http://www.number10.gov.uk/Page22897 [Accessed April 13, 2010].

21 0

Brudney, J.L. England, R.E., 1983. Toward a Definition of the Coproduction Concept. Public Administration Review, 43(1), 59-65.

22 0

Bryman, A., 2008. Social Research Methods 3rd ed., OUP Oxford.

23 0

Burkert, H., 2004. The Mechanics of Public Sector Information. In G. Aichholzer H. Burkert, eds. Public sector information in the digital age: between markets, public management and citizens rights. Edward Elgar Publishing.

24 0

Butler, D., 2007. Data sharing: the next generation. Nature, 446(7131), 10-11.

25 0

Cabinet Office, 2009. Calling Open Data Developers: We need your help. Cabinet Office: Digital Engagement Blog. Available at: http://blogs.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/digitalengagement/post/2009/09/30/Calling-Open-Data-Developers-We-need-your-help.aspx [Accessed November 27, 2009].

26 0

Cameron, D., 2010. Letter to Government departments on opening up data | Number10.gov.uk. Available at: http://www.number10.gov.uk/news/statements-and-articles/2010/05/letter-to-government-departments-on-opening-up-data-51204 [Accessed July 9, 2010].

27 0

Card, S., 2009. Information Visualization. In J. A. Jacko, ed. Human-Computer Interaction. CRC Press.

28 0

Castells, M., 2009. Communication power, Oxford ;;New York: Oxford University Press.

29 0

Castells, M., 2001. The Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, Business, and Society 1st ed., Oxford University Press, USA.

30 0

Chi, E.H., 2000. A taxonomy of visualization techniques using the data state reference model. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization. pp. 69–75.

31 0

Cho, H. LaRose, R., 1999. Privacy issues in Internet surveys. Social Science Computer Review, 17(4), 421.

32 2

Coleman, E. Boland, L., 2010. Can Leviathan stop gobbling people up and start really listening to them? A call for a new form of public sector governance.

33 0

Costello, A.B. Osborne, J.W., 2005. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.

34 0

Couper, M.P., 2000. Web surveys a review of issues and approaches. Public opinion quarterly, 64(4), 464–494.

35 0

Crenson, M.A. Ginsberg, B., 2003. From popular to personal democracy. National Civic Review, 92(2), 173–189.

36 0

Dahl, R.A., 1989. Democracy and its Critics, Yale Univ Pr.

37 0

Dahl, R.A., 2000. On democracy, Yale Univ Pr.

38 0

Daniel, W.W., 1993. Strategic research: Political convenience or practical reality? Policy Studies, 14(3), 4–17.

39 0

Davies, A. Lithwick, D., 2010. Government 2.0 and Access to Information: 2. Recent Developments in Proactive Disclosure and Open Data in the United States and Other Countries (2010-15E), Library of Parliament, Canada. Available at: http://www2.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2010-15-e.htm#a4 [Accessed May 24, 2010].

40 0

De Saulles, M., 2005. e-Government and the Re-use of Public Sector Information. In 5th European conference on e-government: University of Antwerp, Belgium 16-17 June 2005. p. 121.

41 0

Dekkers, M. et al., 2006. MEPSIR Measuring European Public Sector Information Resources, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/actions_eu/policy_actions/mepsir/index_en.htm [Accessed December 21, 2009].

42 0

Dervin, B., 1994. Information - democracy: An examination of underlying assumptions. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(6), 369-385.

43 0

Dewey, J., 1938. Logic-the theory of inquiry, Henry Holt and Company.

44 0

Dierking, H., 2010. Engineering Good Government. In D. Lathrop L. Ruma, eds. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. OReilly Media.

45 0

Diesing, P., 1971. Patterns of Discovery in the Social Sciences Reprint., AldineTransaction.

46 0

Ding, L. et al., 2010. Making Sense of Open Government Data.

47 0

Downs, A., 1957a. An Economic Theory of Democracy, Addison Wesley.

48 0

Downs, A., 1957b. An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy. The Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135-150.

49 0

Dryzek, J. Dunleavy, P., 2009. Theories of the Democratic State, Palgrave Macmillan.

50 0

Dunleavy, P. et al., 2006. Digital era governance: IT corporations, the state, and E-government, Oxford University Press, USA.

51 0

Dunlop, C. Kling, R., 1991. Computerization and controversy: value conflicts and social choices, Academic Press Professional, Inc. San Diego, CA, USA.

52 0

Eaves, D., 2009. Three Laws of Open Data (International Edition. Eaves.ca. Available at: http://eaves.ca/2009/11/29/three-laws-of-open-data-international-edition/ [Accessed June 1, 2010].

53 0

European Commission, 2003a. Directive 2003/9 8/EC of Parliament and Council on the re-use of public sector information, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/docs/pdfs/directive/psi_directive_en.pdf.

54 0

European Commission, 2003b. Public Sector Information Directive, Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/policy/psi/actions_eu/policy_actions/index_en.htm [Accessed December 21, 2009].

55 0

Eynon, R., Fry, J. Schroeder, R., 2008. The ethics of internet research. The SAGE handbook of online research methods, 23.

56 0

Fine, A. et al., 2008. Rebooting America; Ideas for Redesigning American Democracy for the Internet Age,

57 0

Fink, A., 2006. How to conduct surveys : a step-by-step guide 3rd ed., Thousand Oaks ; London: Sage.

58 0

Floridi, L., 2004. Information. In L. Floridi, ed. The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Computing and Information. Wiley-Blackwell.

59 0

Fung, A. Weil, D., 2010. Open Government and Open Society. In D. Lathrop L. Ruma, eds. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. OReilly Media.

60 0

Gray, D.E., 2009. Doing research in the real world, Sage Publications Ltd.

61 0

Hague, B.N. Loader, B., 1999. Digital democracy, Routledge.

62 0

Hatcher, J. Waelde, C., 2007. Open Data Commons » Licenses. Available at: http://www.opendatacommons.org/licenses/ [Accessed June 1, 2010].

63 0

Hayek, F.A., 1944. The road to serfdom,

64 0

Heald, D., 2006. Transparency as an instrumental value. In Proceedings of the British Academy. p. 59.

65 0

Held, D., 2006. Models of democracy, Polity Pr.

66 0

Hindman, M.S., 2009. The myth of digital democracy, Princeton Univ Pr.

67 0

HMG, 2009. Putting the Frontline First: Smarter Government. Available at: http://www.hmg.gov.uk/frontlinefirst/action1/transparency.aspx [Accessed March 7, 2010].

68 0

Hogge, B., 2010. Open Data Study, Open Society Institute. Available at: http://www.soros.org/initiatives/information/focus/communication/articles_publications/publications/open-data-study-20100519.

69 0

Hood, C.C. Margetts, H.Z., 2007. The Tools of Government in the Digital Age 2nd ed., Palgrave Macmillan.

70 0

Hookway, C., 2008. Pragmatism. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/pragmatism/ [Accessed June 23, 2010].

71 0

Huang, J., Thornton, K.M. Efthimiadis, E.N., 2010. Conversational Tagging in Twitter.

72 0

Janesick, V.J., 1999. A Journal About Journal Writing as a Qualitative Research Technique: History, Issues, and Reflections. Qualitative Inquiry, 505 -524.

73 0

Kamarck, E.C., Nye, J.S. (Program), V.O.G.I.T.2.C., 2002. Governance.com, Brookings Institution Press.

74 0

Kish, L., 1965. Survey sampling., New York ; Toronto: J. Wiley.

75 0

Kling, R. Iacono, S., 1995. Computerization movements and the mobilization of support for computerization. In S. L. Star, ed. Ecologies of knowledge: Work and politics in science and technology. pp. 119–153.

76 0

Kling, R. Iacono, S., 1988a. Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements, The. Soc. Probs., 35, 226.

77 0

Kling, R. Iacono, S., 1988b. The Mobilization of Support for Computerization: The Role of Computerization Movements. Social Problems, 35, 226.

78 0

Kling, R., McKim, G. King, A., 2003. A bit more to it: Scholarly communication forums as socio-technical interaction networks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(1), 47–67.

79 0

Lakhani, K.B., 2009. Innocentive.com (A),

80 0

Lathrop, D. Ruma, L., 2010. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice 1st ed., OReilly Media.

81 0

Lawley, D.N. Maxwell, A.E., 1962. Factor Analysis as a Statistical Method. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series D (The Statistician), 12(3), 209-229.

82 0

Le Grand, J., 2007. The other invisible hand: delivering public services through choice and competition, Princeton Univ Pr.

83 0

Lievrouw, L.A., 1994. Information Resources and Democracy: Understanding the Paradox. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 45(6), 350–57.

84 0

Malmud, C. et al., 2007. 8 Principles of Open Government Data. Available at: http://resource.org/8_principles.html [Accessed June 1, 2010].

85 0

Mayo, E. Steinberg, T., 2007. Power of Information Taskforce Report, Available at: http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/reports/power_of_information.aspx [Accessed December 1, 2009].

86 0

Meyer, E., 2010. Socio-technical Interaction Networks: A discussion of the strengths, weaknesses and future of Kling’s STIN model. Social Informatics: An Information Society for all? In Remembrance of Rob Kling, 37–48.

87 0

Miles, M.B. Huberman, A.M., 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook, SAGE publications, Inc.

88 0

Murray-Rust, P. et al., 2009. Panton Principles. Available at: http://pantonprinciples.org/ [Accessed March 4, 2010].

89 0

Needham, C., 2008. Realising the Potential of Co-Production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services. Social Policy and Society, 7(02), 221-231.

90 0

Newbery, D., Bently, L. Pollock, R., 2008. Models of public sector information provision via trading funds.

91 0

Nissenbaum, H., 1998. Protecting privacy in an information age: The problem of privacy in public. Law and Philosophy, 17(5), 559–596.

92 0

Noveck, B.S., 2006. Peer to Patent: Collective Intelligence, Open Review, and Patent Reform. Harv. JL Tech., 20, 123.

93 0

Noveck, B.S., 2010. The Single Point of Failure. In D. Lathrop L. Ruma, eds. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. OReilly Media.

94 0

Noveck, B.S., 2009. Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful, Brookings Inst Pr.

95 0

Obama, B., 2010. Memo from President Obama on Transparency and Open Government. In D. Lathrop L. Ruma, eds. Open Government. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/open/documents/open-government-directive [Accessed April 18, 2010].

96 0

OED Online, 2000. datum. In Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. Available at: http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/50057802/ [Accessed May 22, 2010].

97 0

OKF Open Knowledge Foundation, 2006. Open Knowledge Definition. Available at: http://www.opendefinition.org/ [Accessed March 4, 2010].

98 0

Parycek, P. Sachs, M., 2010. Open Government – Information Flow in Web 2.0. European Journal of ePractice, (9). Available at: http://www.epractice.eu/en/document/313345 [Accessed May 23, 2010].

99 0

Pellegrini, T., 2009. Semantic Web Awareness 2009, The Semantic Web Company. Available at: http://www.semantic-web.at/file_upload/1_tmpphpvuVU1T.pdf [Accessed May 23, 2010].

100 0

PIRA, 2000. Commercial exploitation of Europes Public Sector Information,

101 0

Pizzicannella, R., 2010. Co-production and open data: the right mix for public service effectiveness? In Draft papers. 10th European Conference on eGovernment. Limerick, Ireland. Available at: http://pizzican.wordpress.com/2010/05/23/co-production-and-open-data-in-public-services/#comment-3 [Accessed May 24, 2010].

102 0

Pollock, R., 2009. The Economics of Public Sector Information. Available at: http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/camcamdae/0920.htm [Accessed March 4, 2010].

103 0

Prat, A., 2006. The more closely we are watched, the better we behave? In PROCEEDINGS-BRITISH ACADEMY. p. 91.

104 0

Putnam, H., 1995. Pragmatism: an open question, Wiley-Blackwell.

105 0

Putnam, H. Conant, J., 1995. Words and life, Harvard Univ Pr.

106 0

Rivadeneira, A.W. et al., 2007. Getting our head in the clouds: toward evaluation studies of tagclouds. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems. San Jose, California, USA: ACM, pp. 995-998. Available at: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1240624.1240775 [Accessed July 17, 2010].

107 0

Robinson, D. et al., 2008. Government data and the invisible hand. Yale Journal of Law and Technology, 11, 160.

108 0

Rosling, H., 2006. Hans Rosling shows the best stats youve ever seen, Available at: http://www.ted.com/talks/hans_rosling_shows_the_best_stats_you_ve_ever_seen.html [Accessed May 23, 2010].

109 0

Rosling, H., 2010. The Changing World A New Mindset for a Multipolar World, The World Bank, New York. Available at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cfCdZv1KiSU [Accessed May 23, 2010].

110 0

Rosling, H.A., 2007. Visual technology unveils the beauty of statistics and swaps policy from dissemination to access. Statistical Journal of the IAOS: Journal of the International Association for Official Statistics, 24(1), 103-104.

111 0

Rowley, J.E., 2007. The wisdom hierarchy: representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 0165551506070706v1.

112 0

Scott, J.C., 1998. Seeing like a state, Yale University Press New Haven, CT.

113 0

Sifry, M.L., 2010. You Can Be the Eyes and Years: Barak Obama and the Wisdom of Crowds. In D. Lathrop L. Ruma, eds. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency, and Participation in Practice. OReilly Media.

114 0

Skolnick, B.P., 1995. The uses of social science research: a report of a workshop organised by the ESRC Programme on Information and Communication Technologies,

115 0

Smith, A., 2010. Government Online, Pew Research Centre.

116 0

Snowdon, D., 2010. Its information to data we need, not DIKW. Cognitive Edge. Available at: http://www.cognitive-edge.com/blogs/dave/2010/05/its_information_to_data_we_nee.php [Accessed May 19, 2010].

117 0

Stasavage, D., 2006. Does Transparency Make a Difference? The Example of the European Council of Ministers. In PROCEEDINGS-BRITISH ACADEMY. p. 165.

118 0

Stephenson, D.W., 2009. Data Triggers Transformation. In J. Gøtze C. B. Pedersen, eds. State of the eUnion: Government 2.0 and Onwards. AuthorHouse.

119 0

Stiglitz, J.E., 2000. The contributions of the economics of information to twentieth century economics. Technology, 1441.

120 0

Sunstein, C.R., 2007. Republic. com 2.0, Princeton Univ Pr.

121 0

Suzuki, R. Shimodaira, H., 2006. Pvclust: an R package for assessing the uncertainty in hierarchical clustering. Bioinformatics, 22(12), 1540.

122 0

Tashakkori, A. Teddlie, C., 1998. Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches, Sage Publications, Inc.

123 0

Tennison, J. Sheridan, J., 2010. Linking UK Government Data. In Linked Data on the Web (LDOW2010). WWW2010, Raleigh, North Carolina. Available at: http://events.linkeddata.org/ldow2010/ [Accessed May 19, 2010].

124 0

Torkington, N., 2010. Rethinking Open Data OReilly Radar. OReilly Radar. Available at: http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/02/rethinking-open-data.html [Accessed July 18, 2010].

125 0

Uhlir, P., 2009. The Socioeconomic Effects of Public Sector Information on Digital Networks: Toward a Better Understanding of Different Access and Reuse Policies: Workshop Summary, Available at: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12687 [Accessed September 30, 2009].

126 0

Varnhagen, C.K. et al., 2005. How Informed Is Online Informed Consent? Ethics Behavior, 15(1), 37.

127 0

Viégas, F.B. et al., 2007. Manyeyes: a site for visualization at internet scale. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6), 1121–1128.

128 0

Von Hippel, E., 2005. Democratizing innovation, the MIT Press.

129 0

Weinstein, M., 2008. TAMS Analyser for Macintosh OS X, Available at: http://tamsys.sourceforge.net/.

130 0

Weiss, P., 2004. Borders in Cyberspace: Conflicting Public Sector Information Policies and Their Economic Impacts. In G. Aichholzer H. Burkert, eds. Public sector information in the digital age. Edward Elgar Publishing.

131 0

Wiber, C.K., 1999. Holistic Method. In P. A. OHara, ed. Encyclopedia of political economy. Routledge, p. 451.

132 0

Worthy, B., 2008. The Future of Freedom of Information in the United Kingdom. Political Quarterly, 79(1), 100-108.

133 0

Yin, R.K., 2008. Case study research: Design and methods, Sage Publications, Inc.